Appearance of devices and color
Galaxy A71 | Galaxy A51 |
Colors |
The design of the phones is of a high standard. Galaxy A71 is available in the following colors: blue, black and silver. Galaxy A51 has 3 colors: black, red and white. Both phones are available in the same number of colors.
Kit and description
Both models received the new Android 10 platform (name during development - Android Q), which only the flagship Note 10 had before, improved characteristics compared to their predecessors (A50 and A70) and are practically not inferior in appearance to the brand leaders. These are the first Samsung Galaxy smartphones to feature a macro camera.
Both models are supplied in a white box, which has become standard for this series. The kit, which is also familiar, includes the following accessories:
- Charger;
- USB cable;
- paperclip for removing the tray;
- in-ear headphones.
Size, thickness and weight
Galaxy A71 | Galaxy A51 | |
Screen diagonal | 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
Length | 16.36 cm. | 15.85 cm. |
Width | 7.6 cm. | 7.36 cm. |
Thickness | 0.77 cm. | 0.79 cm. |
Weight | 179 grams | 172 grams |
For reference: there are 2.54 cm in one inch.
The large screen diagonal allows you to view photos and videos with greater comfort, and the small phone easily fits into your pocket. Returning to the compared models, we note that the screen size of the Galaxy A71 is slightly larger than that of its opponent. The weight and thickness of the phones are different: the Galaxy A71 is a little thinner, and the Galaxy A51 weighs a little less.
Design
Looking at the appearance of the Galaxy A51 / Galaxy A71, you can easily confuse them, apparently they are the same smartphone, there seem to be no differences. That's why I decided to combine the review and talk about two gadgets together. If you hold them in your hands and look from the front, then only a sensitive eye will be able to see the difference, and that is, look closely:
Comparison of the front panels of smartphones.
I was not at the presentation, but I held both samples in my hands, and holding them side by side, I immediately saw the difference in both the back cover and the front panel, although for the average user they will be 100% identical. For example, can you tell which one is A51 and which one is A71:
Comparison of the back panels of smartphones.
Don't hurt your eyes, bluish is A51, pink is A71. I will tell you exactly how they differ in appearance towards the end of this review.
The smartphones are actually iconic, as for Samsung, because the A51/A71 are the first smartphones in the Galaxy line with macro cameras, and it’s true, I don’t remember where I’ve seen a macro camera on Samsung before, or whether I’ve seen it at all.
On the front there is a proprietary design from Samsung, which is called Infinity-O, that is, with a round cutout for the front camera. This is better than a drop and even more so than a unibrow. I would have preferred a pop-up camera, but that's me. In general, here is the entire range of front panel designs from Samsung:
Infinity screen design
In this regard, of course, Samsung lags behind Xiaomi, which in its Mi Mix 4 has already implemented and shown a camera inside the screen without any cutouts. I am more than sure that Samsung left this feature for its flagships Galaxy S11 and Note 11. In fact, that the A51 and A71 are the middle segment from Samsung, you will find confirmation of this in the technical specifications.
The notch in the screen has become the hallmark of the smartphone.
If we talk about colors, in real life I liked the black color the most, which was called Prism Crush Black, there are also colors in white, blue and pink style (all also have the Prism Crush prefix):
Colors and coloring.
All except black look too frivolous and are most likely suitable for girls.
The case materials can also speak of the middle segment, because it is made of plastic with a metal frame, so there is no wireless charging here. The plastic is very high quality, somewhat reminiscent of glass, and an inexperienced user can easily confuse high-quality plastic from Samsung with glass. On the reverse side there is a gradient 3D prismatic layer, the pattern of which can vary slightly depending on the angle at which the light falls on it and least of all it plays in black. This material received the marketing name Glastic:
Black color is the most strict and changes the pattern the least.
The metal frame is massive and floats around the ends, which may not be to everyone’s liking; I personally don’t really like this option, I like it when the frame is not visible:
The aluminum frame has contact with the surface.
It’s clear what inspired the designers of the Galaxy A51 / A71, Google Pixel 4 and all similar backdrops, because the design of the backdrop was clearly borrowed from one of these flagships. Apparently, in 2022 we will see the following trend for large square platforms for the main cameras:
Comparison of camera platforms with Pixel 4 and iPhone 11 Pro.
As they say, they will get used to it, people will get used to it and it will become habitual by mid-2022. As for the platform itself with cameras, it sticks out only slightly and will not cause discomfort during use. The ergonomics of the devices are standard, the most common, power and volume buttons on the right, a microphone at the bottom, a Type-C connector, a single multimedia speaker and a 3.5mm jack. On the left is a tray for cards.
The camera platform protrudes slightly.
The dimensions of the A51 are more compact, this is already clear, length 158.5, width 73.6 and thickness 7.9 mm, and weight 172 grams. The A71 is 163.6 mm long, 76 mm wide and 7.7 mm thick with a weight of 179 grams.
The A51 fits very comfortably in the hand.
Screen technical properties
If display characteristics are important to you when choosing a smartphone, then our comparative analysis will help you decide which smartphone has a lower screen.
Galaxy A71 | Galaxy A51 |
Display name | |
Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
Display Description | |
16 million colors | 16 million colors |
Screen resolution, pixels | |
1080×2400 | 1080×2400 |
Pixels per inch | |
393 | 405 |
Which smartphone can you choose based on the data in the table? The Galaxy A51 scored , while the Galaxy A71 was inferior in only one of the parameters under consideration. Thus, the choice in favor of the Galaxy A51 is more preferable.
Phone comparison - select the smartphones you want to compare
Comparison - Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Galaxy A71 is a 2022 smartphone with a weight of 179 g and dimensions of 163.6 x 76 x 7.7 mm.
It has a 6.7 inch screen, 64 megapixel camera and 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM. Its Octa-core processor (2×2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6×1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) Samsung Galaxy A51 is a 2022 smartphone with a weight of 172 g and dimensions of 158.5 x 73.6 x 7.9 mm. It has a 6.5 inch screen, 48 megapixel camera and 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM. Its processor is Octa-core (4×2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4×1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)
For a detailed comparison of all features, see the table below.
or
General characteristics | |||
Make and model | Samsung Galaxy A71 | Samsung Galaxy A51 | |
Rating | (+0) | (+0) | |
release date | 2019, December | 2019, December | |
Dimensions (HxWxD) | 163.6 X 76 X 7.7 mm | 158.5 X 73.6 X 7.9 mm | |
Weight | 179 | 172 | |
Frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | |
Colors | Prism, Crush Black, Silver, Blue, Pink | Prism Crush Black, White, Blue, Pink | |
Battery | 4500 mAh, Unchangeable, Li-Po | 4000 mAh, Unchangeable, Li-Po | |
Battery life | Talk time - Up to 42 hours (4G) Audio playback - Up to 107 hours | Talk time - Up to 32 hours (3G) Audio playback - Up to 87 hours | |
Approximate price | 399 EUR | $280 |
Display | |||
Technologies | Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED | |
Touch screen | yes, capacitive | yes, capacitive | |
Color depth | 16M | 16M | |
Size (Diagonal) | 6.7″ (inches) | 6.5″ (inches) | |
Screen area | 108.4 cm2 | 102.0 cm2 | |
Ratio (height:width) | 20:9 | 20:9 | |
Ratio (screen:body) | 87.2% | 87.4% | |
Resolution (pixels) | 1080 x 2400 px | 1080 x 2400 px | |
DPI | 393 PPI | 405 PPI | |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
Cameras and video | |||
Rear camera, main | 64 MP, Quad camera | 48 MP, Quad camera | |
Characteristics | -64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72″, 0.8µm, PDAF -12 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultra-wide) -5 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (macro camera), 1/ 5.0″, 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.2, 1/5.0″, 1.12µm, for depth measurement | -48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0″, 0.8µm, PDAF -12 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultra-wide) -5 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (macro camera), 1/ 5.0″, 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.2, 1/5.0″, 1.12µm, for depth measurement | |
Functions | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR | |
Video recording | [email protected] , [email protected] /240fps, [email protected] ; gyro-EIS | [email protected] , [email protected] /120fps; gyro-EIS | |
DxOMark main result | 84 | 87 | |
DxOMark photo result | 89 | 90 | |
DxOMark video result | 74 | 86 | |
Front camera, selfie | 32 MP, Single camera | 32 MP, One camera | |
Characteristic | -32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide angle), 1/2.8″, 0.8µm | -32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide angle), 1/2.8″, 0.8µm | |
Functions | HDR | HDR | |
Characteristic | [email protected] | [email protected] | |
DxOMark selfie result | 83 | ||
DxOMark photo result | 83 | ||
DxOMark video result | 82 |
Productivity | |||
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0; OneUI 2 | Android 10.0; OneUI 2 | |
Chipset | — Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm) — Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) — Philippines | - Exynos 9611 (10nm) | |
Central Processing Unit (CPU) | — 8 core (2×2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold + 6×1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | — 8 core (4×2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4×1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | |
Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) | - Adreno 618 | — Mali-G72 MP3 | |
External memory card | microSD, up to 1 TB (dedicated slot) | microSD, up to 1 TB (dedicated slot) | |
Inner memory | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | |
Antutu 8 result | 265537 | 192677 | |
Antutu 7 result | 155326 | ||
GeekBench 5 Single Core result | 509 | 322 | |
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core result | 1638 | 1212 |
Communication and communication | |||
SIM card | Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual standby) | One SIM card (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM cards (Nano-SIM, dual standby) | |
Net | GSM/HSPA/LTE | GSM/HSPA/LTE | |
Show all network frequencies: | |||
Frequencies | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G — LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 20(800), 28(700), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500), 66(1700/2100) | -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G — LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 20(800), 26(850), 28(700), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500), 66(1700/2100) | |
Internet speed | HSPA, LTE-A | HSPA, LTE-A | |
GPRS | Yes | Yes | |
Edge | Yes | Yes | |
WiFi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | |
NFC | Yes (market dependent) | Yes | |
USB | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go | 2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go | |
Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | |
Harmful radiation | SAR - 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.51 W/kg (head) 1.56 W/kg (body) | SAR - 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.37 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
Music and audio | |||
Radio | FM radio | FM radio | |
Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | |
Other | — Active noise reduction with a special microphone | — Active noise reduction with a special microphone |
Other Additions | |||
Sensors | — Fingerprint scanner (on-display, optical), accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass | — Fingerprint scanner (on-display, optical), accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass | |
Other Addons | — ANT+ — Fast battery charging 25W | — ANT+ — Fast battery charging 15W | |
Versions | — Versions: SM-A715F/DS, SM-A715F/DSN (Global); SM-A715F/DSM (Russia) | — Versions: SM-A515F/DSN (Global); SM-A515F/DS (LATAM); SM-A515F/DST (Brazil); SM-A515F/DSM (Russia); SM-A515F/N (Australia) |
Comparison video - not found
Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Samsung Galaxy A51
report this ad Share Share
Memory, processor, battery
To determine the performance difference between these two devices, we recommend taking a closer look at the data below.
Galaxy A71 | Galaxy A51 |
CPU frequency | |
2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Built-in memory | |
|
|
Memory card slot | |
MicroSD (up to 512 GB) | MicroSD (up to 512 GB) |
RAM | |
GB | GB |
Battery capacity | |
4500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
Talk time | |
up to 42 hours | up to 32 hours |
On the Internet | |
until 16 o'clock | until 16 o'clock |
The main advantages of the Galaxy A71 include battery capacity and talk time. As for the Galaxy A51, its advantage is the speed of the processor.
Battery, operating time
The battery type for both is lithium polymer (Li-Po). The A51 has a battery capacity of 4000 mAh, the A71 has a slightly larger one - 4500 mAh. Apparently, this became possible due to the larger size of the device. However, both smartphones can work for two days without recharging. There is no wireless charging. The battery is not removable.
Battery characteristics.
Options | Galaxy A51 | Galaxy A71 |
Battery capacity, mAh | 4000 | 4500 |
Charger power, W | 15 | 25 |
Charging time | 1 hour 50 minutes | 2 hours |
Availability of fast charging | Yes (in 35 minutes up to 40% capacity) | Yes (in 35 minutes up to 50% capacity) |
The table below shows the results of testing the autonomy of smartphones.
Occupation | Galaxy A51 | Galaxy A71 |
Web surfing | 13 hours 21 minutes | 13 hours 18 minutes |
Watch video | 14 hours 22 minutes | 17 hours 48 minutes |
Talk | 21 hours 51 minutes | 30 hours 02 minutes |
Camera Specifications
Do you often take photographs? Let's determine whether there are differences in cameras. Table below.
Galaxy A71 | Galaxy A51 |
Main camera | |
4 camera system: 64MP, 12MP, 5MP, 5MP | 4 camera system: 48MP, 12MP, 5MP, 5MP |
Matrix resolution | |
64 MP | 48 MP |
Digital zoom | |
8x | 8x |
Front camera matrix resolution | |
32 MP | 32 MP |
If photo quality is important to you, then the Galaxy A71 is the best option. The device allows you to take photos that will be clear and bright not only on your smartphone, but also on the big screen.
Software
In this part, a comparison between Samsung Galaxy A51 and A71 will not reveal any difference. They have everything the same. The latest version of the platform is installed - Android 10, the final release of which was released in September 2019. The OS is already trying to predict the user’s actions - having received a link to a video, it will immediately offer to open it. The proprietary shell, developed by the company specifically for one-handed operation, has been updated to OneUI 2.0, and therefore the following has changed:
- The set of gestures with which you can control the device has been expanded;
- night mode has improved;
- the interface has become more compact;
- the animation has become slightly different;
- it became possible to video record what was happening on the screen.
See also: Samsung Galaxy A50 review - what's interesting about a mid-budget smartphone
Extra options
For a complete picture, pay attention to the additional characteristics of the models.
Galaxy A71 | Galaxy A51 |
SIM card | |
Dual-SIM: Nano-SIM (4FF) | Dual-SIM: Nano-SIM (4FF) |
Image stabilization | |
— | — |
Video recording, frame rate | |
UHD 4K (3840 x 2160) at 30fps | UHD 4K (3840 x 2160) at 30fps |
Water protection | |
— | — |
NFC module | |
There is | There is |
Geolocation | |
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Authentication | |
fingerprint reading | fingerprint reading |
Headphone jack | |
3.5mm Stereo | 3.5mm Stereo |
We have made all the main comparisons. We hope you now have enough information to make your choice.
Impression
Both smartphones look no worse than flagships. You stop noticing the hole for the camera an hour after you start communicating with the device. The frame around the perimeter of the screen is also almost invisible. The back side of the case pleases with the absence of additional details and inscriptions. A little confusing is that it is completely plastic.
- The elongated display (20:9) makes it possible to place more information on it. The picture on the screen is perfect - there is no grain, the colors are contrasty and saturated. The brightness is enough for use on a sunny day.
- Since the fingerprint scanner is optical, it does not work as quickly as similar flagship devices that operate on ultrasound. However, this is not very noticeable.
- The photo opportunities are great. You can shoot everything: portraits, landscapes, ants - these at a distance of a couple of centimeters. True, it would be nice to have an HDR function. At times it may not be enough.
- The front camera is also not ideal - it can produce photos with poor detail. And for reliable facial recognition, it would be nice to improve its quality. Nowadays, such unlocking takes place confidently only in good lighting. It would also be nice to have at least some kind of stabilization.
- The sound is very ordinary. And what can you expect if each device includes only one speaker. A big plus is the volume headroom and lack of distortion.
- The batteries installed in both models are quite capacious. Even with continuous use, you can be confident in a day's work.
Without taking into account the cost, the comparison of Samsung Galaxy A51 vs A71 can be assessed as follows. The two noticeable differences are performance and image quality. The A71 wins this one. The camera's matrix is a third larger and the chipset is one of the best in the middle class. If anyone wants to get the most out of PUBG Mobile, they certainly need the A71. The A71's photos are also slightly better.
At the same time, the price of gadgets is different - today A71 can be bought for 24,350 rubles, and A51 costs from 18,400 rubles. Is this gain worth the money that needs to be paid for it? Maybe. Which is better: A51 or A71 - everyone decides for himself.
conclusions
We did not compare all parameters with each other, but only the main ones. According to these parameters, the Galaxy A71 turned out to be better with 5 likes, while the Galaxy A51 had 3. In conclusion, we will once again list the advantages of smartphones:
Galaxy A71 | Galaxy A51 |
|
|
Performance
The phones received completely different processors. The A71 has hardware from the American brand Qualcomm - an 8nm Snapdragon 730 processor with fairly powerful Adreno 618 graphics. The Samsung A51 has a 10nm Exynos 9611 processor. Both chips have 8 cores, but let's compare their performance. For this purpose, it is appropriate to present the benchmark results.
Samsung A71:
- AnTuTu 7 – 192458
- Graphics test GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen) – 27
- Graphics test GFX 3.1 Car scene (onscreen) – 15
Galaxy A51:
- AnTuTu 7 – 113051
- GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen) – 10
- Graphics test GFX 3.1 Car scene (onscreen) – 5.6
Samsung A71 is a level higher than A51. But this is the merit of Qualcomm - the Snapdragon 730 chip is the most powerful in the middle class, and Samsung's proprietary Exynos 9611 will ensure stable operation of the shell, but there may be problems in games.
Smartphones similar to Galaxy A71
What analogues for the Galaxy A71 exist in the Samsung line? Let's determine which basic parameters of the devices are similar and present the result in the form of a table.
Model | Similarity | Prices |
Galaxy A51 | 93.4% | from 14850 rub. |
Galaxy A31 | 89.1% | from 12789 rub. |
Galaxy M31s | 89.0% | from 21638 rub. |
Galaxy A80 | 88.3% | from 32990 rub. |
Galaxy A41 | 87.2% | from 13890 rub. |
Let's sum it up
It's time to take stock. As for the main parameters, the Galaxy A71 model received 6 likes, while the Galaxy A70 received 0. However, it is worth considering that we did not compare the prices of the devices. It's time to reveal the winner. Let's look at the advantages of each model:
Galaxy A71 | Galaxy A70 |
|
Similar smartphones to Galaxy A51
How many similarities does the Galaxy A51 smartphone have with other Samsung models? Thanks to comparative analysis, we were able to identify all the similarities.
Model | Similarity | Prices |
Galaxy A71 | 93.4% | from 22728 rub. |
Galaxy A50 | 91.9% | from 15490 rub. |
Galaxy A80 | 89.9% | from 32990 rub. |
Galaxy A41 | 89.2% | from 13890 rub. |
Galaxy A31 | 87.5% | from 12789 rub. |
*All data in the tables is for reference. Please check with sellers for prices and specifications before purchasing.
What is better: Samsung Galaxy A50 or Galaxy A51
The unspoken competition “Samsung A50 vs A51” does not give a clear answer to the question: “Which smartphone is better?” The former has more solid autonomy, better performance and a lower price. The advantages of the A51 include an improved camera, the ability to shoot video in 4K format, an enlarged display with a stylish cutout for a selfie camera, and the presence of Android 10 in the original configuration. To make a choice, you should prioritize among the stated advantages and buy exactly the smartphone that meets your individual needs.