Comparison Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A51 4/128Gb

Comparison of all parameters of Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Samsung Galaxy A51 4/128Gb: advantages and disadvantages of the models. Which is better to choose: Samsung Galaxy A52 5G or Samsung Galaxy A51 4/128Gb

Name	Samsung Galaxy A52 5G	Samsung Galaxy A51 4/128Gb

Antutu benchmark (performance)	326155	177833
CPU	Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G	Samsung Exynos 9611
Screen diagonal	6.5 «	6.5 «
Permission	2400×1080	2340×1080
Multitouch (number of touches)	10	10
Random access memory (RAM)	6 GB	4 GB
Frameless	Yes	Yes
Internal memory (ROM)	128 GB	128 GB
Expansion slots	MicroSD, support for cards up to 256GB	MicroSD, support for cards up to 256GB
Rear camera	64 MP	48 MP
Camera	Four cameras	Triple camera
Matrix model (sensor)	Sony IMX682	Samsung GM2
dxomark mobile rating
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	32 MP	32 MP
Battery	5000 mAh	4000 mAh
Wireless charger	No	No
Network type	5G	4G
Number of SIM cards
WiFi	Eat	Eat
Bluetooth	Eat	Eat
NFC	Eat	Eat
Navigation	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Event indicator	No	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Eat	Eat
operating system	Android 10.0 (Q)	Android 10.0 (Q)
Housing material	Metal frame, plastic body	Plastic
Weight	187 g	172 g
Dimensions (size)	159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm	158.5 x 73.6 x 7.9 mm
Price	Coming soon. You can view all Samsung models here Analogues of the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Samsung Galaxy A03s - compare Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb - compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 6/128GB - compare	Temporarily out of stock. You can view all Samsung models here Analogues of Samsung Galaxy A51 4/128Gb: Samsung Galaxy A21s 4/64GB - compare Samsung Galaxy A70 8/128Gb - compare Samsung Galaxy M12 4/64GB - compare

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A51 4/128Gb: camera comparison.

In this table you can compare the cameras of Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A51, see the difference between the 64MP Sony IMX682 sensor and the 48MP Samsung GM2. Understand which camera has the maximum advantages over a competitor's camera and make the right choice.

Name	Samsung Galaxy A52 5G	Samsung Galaxy A51 4/128Gb
Rear camera	64 MP	48 MP
Matrix model (sensor)	Sony IMX682	Samsung GM2
Flash	Dual LED	Dual LED
Front (selfie) camera	32 MP	32 MP
Flash	No	No

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A51 4/128Gb: Battery life, how long does the charge last?

Below you can find Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A51 battery life tests and their capacity. Compare how long batteries hold a charge in different modes and see which chargers support these models.

Name	Samsung Galaxy A52 5G	Samsung Galaxy A51 4/128Gb
Battery	5000 mAh	4000 mAh
Battery Type	Fixed	Fixed
Standby time	6-7 days	5-6 days
Normal operating time	3-4 days	2-3 days
Operating time with continuous use	10-12 hours	7-8 hours
Talk time	30 hours	30 hours
Fast charging function	Eat	Eat
Wireless charger	No	No

Phone comparison - select the smartphones you want to compare

Comparison - Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Samsung Galaxy A51

Samsung Galaxy A52 is a 2022 smartphone with a weight of 189 g and dimensions of 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm.
It has a 6.5 inch screen, 64 megapixel camera and 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM. Its Octa-core processor (2×2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6×1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) Samsung Galaxy A51 is a 2022 smartphone with a weight of 172 g and dimensions of 158.5 x 73.6 x 7.9 mm. It has a 6.5 inch screen, 48 megapixel camera and 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM. Its processor is Octa-core (4×2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4×1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)

For a detailed comparison of all features, see the table below.

General characteristics
Make and model	Samsung Galaxy A52	Samsung Galaxy A51
Rating	(+0)	(+0)
release date	2021, March 17	2019, December
Dimensions (HxWxD)	159.9 X 75.1 X 8.4 mm	158.5 X 73.6 X 7.9 mm
Weight	189	172
Frame	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame
Colors	Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue	Prism Crush Black, White, Blue, Pink
Battery	4500 mAh, Li-Po, Unchangeable	4000 mAh, Unchangeable, Li-Po
Battery life	Talk time - Up to 32 hours (3G) Audio playback - Up to 87 hours
Approximate price	340 EUR	$280

Display
Technologies	Super AMOLED	Super AMOLED
Touch screen	yes, capacitive	yes, capacitive
Color depth	16M	16M
Size (Diagonal)	6.5″ (inches)	6.5″ (inches)
Screen area	101 cm2	102.0 cm2
Ratio (height:width)	20:9	20:9
Ratio (screen:body)	84,1%	87.4%
Resolution (pixels)	1080 x 2400 px	1080 x 2400 px
DPI	407 PPI	405 PPI
Screen protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Other	— 90Hz -800 nits (peak)

Cameras and video
Rear camera, main	64 MP, Quad camera	48 MP, Quad camera
Characteristics	-64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS -12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultra-wide), 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.4, ( macro camera) -5 MP, f/2.4, (for depth measurement)	-48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0″, 0.8µm, PDAF -12 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultra-wide) -5 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (macro camera), 1/ 5.0″, 1.12µm -5 MP, f/2.2, 1/5.0″, 1.12µm, for depth measurement
Functions	LED flash, panorama, HDR	LED flash, panorama, HDR
Video recording	[email protected] , [email protected] /60fps; gyro-EIS	[email protected] , [email protected] /120fps; gyro-EIS
DxOMark main result	102	87
DxOMark photo result	107	90
DxOMark video result	90	86
Front camera, selfie	32 MP, Single camera	32 MP, One camera
Characteristic	-32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide angle), 1/2.8", 0.8µm	-32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide angle), 1/2.8″, 0.8µm
Functions	HDR	HDR
Characteristic	[email protected] , [email protected]	[email protected]

Productivity
Operating system (OS)	Android 11, One UI 3.1	Android 10.0; OneUI 2
Chipset	— Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)	- Exynos 9611 (10nm)
Central Processing Unit (CPU)	— 8 core (2×2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold + 6×1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver)	— 8 core (4×2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4×1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)
Graphics Processing Unit (GPU)	- Adreno 618	— Mali-G72 MP3
External memory card	microSDXC (use shared SIM slot)	microSD, up to 1 TB (dedicated slot)
Inner memory	128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM	64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM
Antutu 9 result	341091
Antutu 8 result	192677
Antutu 7 result	155326
GeekBench 5 Single Core result	592	322
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core result	1791	1212

Communication and communication
SIM card	Single SIM (Nano-SIM)Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual standby)	One SIM card (Nano-SIM)Dual SIM cards (Nano-SIM, dual standby)
Net	GSM/HSPA/LTE	GSM/HSPA/LTE
Show all network frequencies:
Frequencies	-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE	-2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 -4G — LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 13(700), 17(700), 20(800), 26(850), 28(700), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500), 66(1700/2100)
Internet speed	HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A	HSPA, LTE-A
GPRS	Yes	Yes
Edge	Yes	Yes
WiFi	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot
GPS	Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
NFC	Yes (market/region dependent)	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, USB On-The-Go	2.0, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, USB On-The-Go
Bluetooth	5.0, A2DP, LE	5.0, A2DP, LE
Harmful radiation	SAR EU - 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body)	SAR - 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.37 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body)

Music and audio
Radio	FM radio
Headphone jack	Yes	Yes
Other	— Stereo speakers	— Active noise reduction with a special microphone

Other Additions
Sensors	— Fingerprint scanner (on-display, optical), accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass	— Fingerprint scanner (on-display, optical), accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Other Addons	— ANT+ — Fast battery charging 25W, 50% for 30 min. — Water and dust protection IP67 (up to 1m for 30 min)	— ANT+ — Fast battery charging 15W
Versions	— Other names: Samsung Galaxy A52 4G	— Versions: SM-A515F/DSN (Global); SM-A515F/DS (LATAM); SM-A515F/DST (Brazil); SM-A515F/DSM (Russia); SM-A515F/N (Australia)

Comparison video - not found

Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Samsung Galaxy A51

report this ad Share Share

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A51 4/128Gb: Antutu benchmark

In the AnTuTu benchmark test, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G scored 326155 (score / points), which is 83.41% faster than the result of the Samsung Galaxy A51 4/128Gb (177833 points). Below you can compare its performance with other models based on the Antutu benchmark rating. This will really help you make a better choice than subjective tops, reviews and testimonials.

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G 6.5″ (2400×1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 750G / 6GB / 128GB / 64MP Sony IMX682 / 5000mAh

Coming soon

326155

Samsung Galaxy A51 4/128Gb 6.5″ (2340×1080) Curved Glass / Exynos 9611 / 4GB / 128GB / 48MP Samsung GM2 / 4000mAh

0.00rub

$0.00

177833

View full table

Galaxy A51 vs Galaxy A52. More than just evolution

Hello people, 2022 has changed a lot in all areas of life, including in the mobile industry. A lot of people have started turning their attention to the mid-range market rather than flagships. This is not surprising; the middle class has grown very much in recent years and, in fact, is inferior to flagships only in some sense in functions that are unnecessary for daily experience.

In this segment, Galaxy A51 became the most successful Android smartphone of the year worldwide. Almost 2 million A51s were sold in Russia, which is simply colossal.

Thus, it seems Samsung has found the recipe for success and is now trying its best to replicate the success of the Galaxy A51 by releasing a direct sequel called the Galaxy A52. The new smartphone comes in 4G and 5G variants, but more importantly, it boasts some flagship-level specifications that might convince even Galaxy A51 owners to upgrade their smartphone.

The success of last year's Galaxy A51, as I noted in my review of this smartphone, can be attributed to the solid build quality and beautiful design, excellent AMOLED Infinity-O display, excellent One UI shell and decent cameras.

What did Samsung do this year? They improved the smartphone in all these areas, but they didn't stop and improved some more.

So, the design of the Galaxy A52 has been redesigned and now presents a simpler style, as the camera block is made in the color of the back. The block still protrudes slightly beyond the body, but visually, it looks much more organic.

The back of the smartphone is still made of polycarbonate, but now it has a matte finish. Therefore, fingerprints are practically invisible on it. All colors are light, in keeping with the new design language.

In my opinion, the A52 is undoubtedly superior to the A51 in design. There are no changes in build quality, everything is as good as it was. Buttons on the right. The slot location has moved to the top and the slot itself is now a combo slot. That is, you will not be able to insert two SIM cards and a micro SD into it, like in the A51. You will have to choose either two SIM cards, or one SIM card + microSD.

Let's move on to the next point. Galaxy A52 is equipped with the same 6.5-inch display, but with a higher refresh rate (90 Hz / 120 Hz for 4G / 5G respectively, in Russia only 4G). Brightness increased from 600 to 800 nits. On top is Gorilla Glass 5 protection. The A51 has 3rd generation protective glass.

In the case of cameras, you get the same package as last year. These are the main camera, super wide-angle, macro and depth sensor. However, the A52 has a better main sensor.

On the A51 it is 48 MP f/2.0, and on the A52 it is 64 MP, f/1.8. That is, the sensor resolution and aperture ratio have increased. This should give the new fighter an advantage in low light; the smartphone uses tetra-binning technology, resulting in brighter new photos.

However, based on the first photos from the A52, I would not say that there is any great progress in night photography. So don't count on a miracle.

But the A52 camera added optical image stabilization, and that’s more of a deal.

In general, the camera began to take more detailed and clear pictures, but otherwise the improvements were not radical.

The remaining sensors remained unchanged. As well as video shooting modes. Both smartphones are capable of FHD 60 fps, and 4K 30 fps. The A52 boasts a new camera mode called Fun with Snapchat filters and masks. Quite similar to AR sketches, but of course there are more different filters, and they will be constantly updated. I admit that later other smartphones will receive this mode. Although at the presentation they said that this is an exclusive mode for the A52 and A72.

In fact, on smartphones of this class, the only thing that matters is how the main camera shoots. Because with other sensors we usually get very mediocre results that we don’t even want to compare. Moreover, both macro and super-wide can be replaced by the main camera in 95% of cases.

Therefore, it is very good that Samsung has focused its efforts on the main lens. It's nice to see the addition of optical stabilization, increased aperture and higher resolution.

The selfie camera remains the same, it is 32 MP f/2.2.

Moving on to the software, One Ui 3.1 has become even more interesting. Although this is a conditional advantage, because the A51 will also receive this software version a little later.

But the A52 will receive major updates for 1 year longer, up to Android 14. While the last big update of the A51 will be version 13 of Android.

The battery capacity on the A52 has increased by 500 mAh, amounting to 4,500 mAh versus 4,000 mAh. Fast charging support has also become larger: 25 W versus 15 W, but both smartphones come with 15 W charging.

Speaking of the package, the A51 has the advantage of coming with good AKG headphones.

Still no wireless charging. This, of course, could be another killer feature of the A52, and we previously heard that Samsung was considering adding this feature to the mid-range segment, but that's not the case. The A52 and A72 did not receive wireless charging.

But they got stereo speakers. The sound on the A52 is 43% louder than the A51. But more importantly, the sound quality has improved. It now sounds much bigger and clearer. This is a big advantage of the A52.

Another advantage of the new product is the addition of protection against water and dust according to the IP67 standard. Now you don't have to worry about dropping your smartphone in the toilet. No, it's still scary. But at least the phone will survive when immersed in water up to a meter for 30 minutes. I tested my A52 and it really is not afraid of short-term immersion in water. Everything worked and still works.

And finally, the chip was also updated. Samsung decided to switch to Snapdragon this year, however, don't think that Exynos is losing ground. Most likely, it was more profitable to install the Snapdragon 720G in a smartphone than Exynos’ own solution. The A52 5G version comes with an even more powerful Snapdragon 750G chip.

Let me remind you that the A51 was released on Exynos 9611. There is actually no radical difference between this chip and the 720G. True, they have different technical processes, 8nm for the Snapdragon 720G versus 10nm for the Exynos 9611. This means that the chip from Qualcomm should be more energy efficient.

In practice, I didn't notice much of a difference in performance between the two smartphones. They both handle heavy games on medium graphics settings and they both fly through the interface and applications if they have enough RAM.

By the way, the RAM and storage memory options are similar, except that the starting version of the A52 now starts with 128 GB of permanent memory, versus 64 GB for the A51. There is an option for RAM, from 4 to 8 GB. And I recommend taking more RAM, since 4 GB is not enough for these smartphones. And to be honest, I don’t understand at all why the A52 even has this 4 GB option. Absolutely, it was necessary to install 6 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage in the basic configuration.

But we have what we have. It remains to talk about prices. And here there is a tricky moment. Because the starting global price of a smartphone has remained virtually unchanged, however, in our market it has increased by as much as 7,000 rubles.

Yes, the A52 in the 4+128 GB version costs 27,000 rubles. And of course it's a little expensive. This is clearly a price with a reserve, in order to later make various promotions and discounts. Although on the other hand, looking at all these characteristics and improvements, this is definitely an upper-mid-level smartphone, i.e. it seems to be of a higher class than the A51.

Therefore, by the way, it is quite difficult to say which of these smartphones is better. The A51 is still very competitive today. In terms of price-quality ratio, it still has no equal.

However, the A52 offers much more. But the price also turned out to be higher.

Accordingly, when choosing between these smartphones, I would proceed from your budget. They are both worth the money and the price difference is more than justified.

The Galaxy A51 has a screen limited to 60Hz, has an older, less powerful chip (though not by much), less memory as standard, slower (15W) charging, weaker Gorilla Glass, no OIS for the main camera, no rated IP67, there are no stereo speakers, and the A51 may already have a more dated design language.

The Galaxy A52 brings significant improvements in many key areas without making any sacrifices. Some of these updates are unexpected but more than welcome, and what it ultimately comes down to is that the Galaxy A52 is a worthy buy for both new customers and existing Galaxy A51 owners.

The Galaxy A52 isn't just an annual update with a few upgraded components, it's more of a next-generation mid-range device.

People, but write in the comments, will you buy the Galaxy A52? How do you feel about this price? Will you update from A51?

Feel free to join us in the comments below and share your thoughts.

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A51 4/128Gb: Geekbench benchmark

In the Geekbench benchmark test, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G scored 613 (score / points) in the “Single-core”, which is 76.15% faster than the result of the Samsung Galaxy A51 4/128Gb (348 points). In "Multi-core" 1916 vs 1230 (55.77% faster). Below you can compare its performance with other models based on the Geekbench benchmark rating. This will really help you make a choice than subjective tops, reviews and testimonials.